Leveled Commitment and Trust in Negotiation
نویسندگان
چکیده
As agents become more autonomous, agent negotiation and motivational attitudes such as commitment and trust become more important. In this paper we consider the important choice in advanced negotiation applications whether negotiation parameters – such as cardinality of interaction, agent attitude, and agent architectures – are incorporated in the negotiation protocol or in the negotiation strategy. Only in the first case parameters are fixed and agents do not have to reason about them when they choose their strategy. We define a dynamic deontic logic which can also be used for the second case, because it models concepts like leveled commitment and trust. For example, it formalizes that violating commitments leads to a decrease in trustworthiness.
منابع مشابه
Leveled Commitment Contracting among Myopic Individually Rational Agents
In automated negotiation systems consisting of selfinterested agents, contracts have traditionally been binding, i.e., impossible to breach. Such contracts do not allow the agents to act e ciently upon future events. A leveled commitment protocol allows the agents to decommit from contracts by paying a monetary penalty to the contracting partner. The e ciency of such protocols depends heavily o...
متن کاملAlgorithms for Optimizing Leveled Commitment Contracts Algorithms for Optimizing Leveled Commitment Contracts
In automated negotiation systems consisting of self-interested agents, contracts have traditionally been binding. Leveled commitment contracts | i.e. contracts where each party can decommit by paying a predetermined penalty | were recently shown to improve Pareto ef-ciency even if agents rationally decommit in Nash equilibrium using innated thresholds on how good their outside ooers must be bef...
متن کاملRevenue Equivalence of Leveled Commitment Contracts Revenue Equivalence of Leveled Commitment Contracts
In automated negotiation systems consisting of self-interested agents, contracts have traditionally been binding. Leveled commitment contracts | i.e. contracts where each party can decommit by paying a predetermined penalty|were recently shown to improve expected social welfare even if agents decommit insincerely in Nash equilibrium. Such contracts diier based on whether agents have to declare ...
متن کاملLeveled Commitment Contracts with Myopic and Strategic Agents
In automated negotiation systems consisting of self-interested agents, contracts have traditionally been binding, i.e., impossible to breach. Such contracts do not allow the agents to e$ciently deal with future events. This de"ciency can be tackled by using a leveled commitment contracting protocol which allows the agents to decommit from contracts by paying a monetary penalty to the contractin...
متن کاملAdvantages of a Leveled Commitment
In automated negotiation systems consisting of self-interested agents, contracts have traditionally been binding. Such contracts do not allow agents to eeciently accommodate future events. Game theory has proposed contingency contracts to solve this problem. Among computational agents, contingency contracts are often impractical due to large numbers of interdependent and unanticipated future ev...
متن کامل